Do we still advocate using directory submission as a valid SEO tactic?

Tim Capper: Yes, but niche ones related to your business, so get the words "decent service" out of your vocabulary There will more then likely be only 5 or 6 hyper relevant ones to any business.

Dave Elliott: Local and niche only. If you dont imagine that you would ever use the site to find stuff or it has any other use to the industry/site dont bother with it.

Tino Triste: I agree with 

Steve Bonin:  ; ;Thanks guys this is helpful

Tino Triste: Glad to help 

Tim Capper: Yes, but <b>niche</b> ones related to your business, so get the words &quot;decent service&quot; out of your vocabulary<br /><br />There will more then likely be only 5 or 6 hyper relevant ones to any business.

Simon Fryer: <br /><br />It&#39;s certainly not a standalone tactic but submitting to a few highly relevant directories is a good call, especially if it&#39;s a new site/business as they are quick to turn around and help establish a footprint.<br /><br />If you have a budget for it trade association directory links are a good kick-start.<br /><br />I&#39;d say directories are a bit more valuable if you&#39;re targeting localised keywords (NAP)<br /><br />

Unique Websites: IMO, the days of paying for directory input are long gone. As said above, I would only use niche and local directories, possibly 1 or 2 respected others such as dmoz or aboutus.<br /><br />I read an article recently by someone who&#39;s helping a company hit by unnatural links, and that suggested that Google is comparing your links profile with the link profiles of your competitors. If you have - for example - ;50 links from ;directories (even good solid high page ranking directories) and your competitors don&#39;t, this could be a red flag for unnatural links.

SEO and Social Media for Attorneys: Comments from Matt Cutts of Google on what to consider when submitting to a Directory.<br /><br />When considering submitting to a directory, I’d ask questions like:<br />- Does the directory reject urls? <br />If every url passes a review, the directory gets closer to just a list of links or a free-for-all link site.<br /><br />- What is the quality of urls in the directory? <br />Suppose a site rejects 25% of submissions, but the urls that are accepted/listed are still quite low-quality or spammy. That doesn’t speak well to the quality of the directory.<br /><br />- If there is a fee, what’s the purpose of the fee? <br />For a high-quality directory, the fee is primarily for the time/effort for someone to do a genuine evaluation of a url.<br /><br />Matt Cutts, Google<br /><br />

Janna Maica Feliciano: Aside from the niche &amp; locality of the directories, you should also check if it is well-maintained (e.g. Not spammed, new websites added to list regularly, and other factors you consider as &quot;quality&quot;)

William Gomes: Personally, no. Come on, when was the last time you used a directory to find a site?<br /><br />If your answer is yes you did then yes submit to that one ;)

Mark Preston: Got to agree with Janna, I stay away from anything that is not strongly related to my niche or a local directory. However some of the larger sites are still going all out for any old directory sites as ; mentioned in the post by +Kirk Fletcher below

Unique Websites: On the subject of directories, would you say that (which charges a hefty fee and gives dofollow links, sometimes lots of them) could trigger a penalty?

SEO and Social Media for Attorneys: I am still confused about how Google determines which directories are good and which ones are bad. The directory you mention seems to meet some of the criteria of a good one. It would matter where the dofollow links come from. ;

Tino Triste: it&#39;s simple... If you feel that you might get referral traffic from a directory you should submit, otherwise don&#39;t bother. 

W.E. Jonk: From the expert panel in this weeks SEO Questions hangout on air on 00:28:55 into the YouTube video: