Dumb SEO Questions

(Entry was posted by K Neeraj Kayastha on this post in the Dumb SEO Questions community on Facebook, Sunday, March 29, 2015).

Wikipedia keywords stuffing is justified

Wikipedia keywords stuffing is justified, not Mine? Is Google biased?

Sharing here 2 snippets - 1 of wikipedia and the other is of my site knkayastha. 

You can see that Minar has been repeated 4 times in wikipedia`s results and it comes first in SERP. Why my description with 3 times of Neeraj is keywords stuffing?

This question begins at 00:03:53 into the clip. Did this video clip play correctly? Watch this question on YouTube commencing at 00:03:53
Video would not load
I see YouTube error message
I see static
Video clip did not start at this question

YOUR ANSWERS

Selected answers from the Dumb SEO Questions G+ community.

  • K Neeraj Kayastha: <b>Wikipedia keywords stuffing is justified, not Mine?</b> <b>Is Google biased?</b>

    Sharing here 2 snippets - 1 of wikipedia and the other is of my site knkayastha. ;

    You can see that <b>Minar</b> has been repeated 4 times in wikipedia&#39;s results and it comes first in SERP. Why my description with 3 times of <b>Neeraj</b> is keywords stuffing?
  • Pankaj Asopa: Here is one more thing wikipedia url contain that word too and urs not! Wikipedia is considered as knowledge base, infact google knowledge panel bring all the result from Wikipedia only...also in my opinion keyword stuffing is somewhat after exceeding some set of words, i am not sure bt there must be some rule such as it should not repeat more then 5 times or something like that...not sure on this though....
  • Edwin Jonk: Wikipedia doesn&#39;t use meta description. This snippet is generated by Google. In this case, it is just the first line in the article.
  • K Neeraj Kayastha: we all know this. But google may have selected any other sentence because when meta- description is not provided, it selects the most relevant parts from the page for the searched query...
    Many a times we see that google makes a snippet of part of 2-3 sentences where the queries are present.
    I deduce that Google sees the starting of page as most relevant despite so many repetation of term.

    Note: snippet of my site comes at 9 to 13 positions for <b>Neeraj Kumar</b> but I haven&#39;t find a result for Neeraj yet till 10 pages.
  • Edwin Jonk: I see. I thought you were complaining about Wikipedia keyword stuffing the meta description. But you asking why Google picked this meta description, right?
  • K Neeraj Kayastha: Yeah,  ;not complaining but deducing that what we think about Keyword-stuffing is not perfect.
    If the context is obviously natural or repeatative ;use of that word is necessary, google will not penalize. ;
    See my snippet with such meta-description also appear in SERP.

View original question in the Dumb SEO Questions community on Facebook, Sunday, March 29, 2015).

Reference Links