Dumb SEO Questions

(Entry was posted by Edwin Jonk on this post in the Dumb SEO Questions community on Facebook, 09/24/2015).

Google charges advertisers for YouTube ads fake views

" Even though the bots “viewed” two of the videos 150 times, YouTube’s public view-counter only listed 25 of the views. Its system had apparently identified the rest of the views as fake and so weeded them out. "

" Google’s Adwords ad platform, however, charged the researchers for 91 views — indicating that some views that it didn’t deem real enough to count in the view-counter clearly counted against advertisers. "? Richard Hearne   Good share Edwin.  Note this quote:

"That doesn’t look good for YouTube. If the company charges advertisers for fake views, they will be less likely to want to shell out their money."

If anything it looks very good for YouTube, and exceedingly bad for Adwords.  I expect this will create some major headaches if advertisers see it.? A new study indicates that Google charges advertisers for YouTube ads even when it thinks a robot viewed them
This question begins at 01:10:40 into the clip. Did this video clip play correctly? Watch this question on YouTube commencing at 01:10:40
Video would not load
I see YouTube error message
I see static
Video clip did not start at this question

YOUR ANSWERS

Selected answers from the Dumb SEO Questions Facebook & G+ community.

  • Edwin Jonk: " Even though the bots “viewed” two of the videos 150 times, YouTube’s public view-counter only listed 25 of the views. Its system had apparently identified the rest of the views as fake and so weeded them out. "

    " Google’s Adwords ad platform, however, charged the researchers for 91 views — indicating that some views that it didn’t deem real enough to count in the view-counter clearly counted against advertisers. "
  • Richard Hearne: Good share Edwin.  ;Note this quote:

    "That doesn’t look good for YouTube. If the company charges advertisers for fake views, they will be less likely to want to shell out their money."

    If anything it looks very good for YouTube, and exceedingly bad for Adwords.  ;I expect this will create some major headaches if advertisers see it.
  • Edwin Jonk: here is the full study: ;http://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.08874v1.pdf

View original question in the Dumb SEO Questions community on Facebook, 09/24/2015).