How many of you implemented revisit-after meta tag, and experienced that this tag really works?

Selected answers from the Dumb SEO Questions Facebook & G+ community.

• 
  Girish Kapoor: Revisit-After Meta Tag is really worked or not
  
  How many of you implemented revisit-after meta tag, and experienced that this tag really works. In my case, it is not working exactly the way I thought.
• 
  Jim Munro: I think you'll find it is a waste of space, Girish. Googlebot will come back on it's own timetable.
• 
  Rahul Chauhan: this will add no value, all its depends on the updating frequency of the website.
• 
  Ammon Johns: Revist after is mostly a waste of time, and it was only ever meant as a throttle, never, ever an accellerator.
  
  If you are worried that the search spiders are taking up too much of your bandwidth, the idea was to implement revisit after so they wouldn't keep grabbing the same page before it changed.
  
  There is no tag anywhere that will make a spider visit you sooner.
• 
  Edwin Jonk: From the expert panel in this weeks SEO Questions hangout on air on 00:47:12 into the YouTube video: https://dumbseoquestions.com/q/how_many_of_you_implemented_revisitafter_meta_tag_and_experienced_that_this_tag_really_works +Girish Kapoor
  
  The cuetimes listed on this page are functional while the live broadcast continues and also once Youtube has finished processing the public broadcast. Processing time varies between 6-24 hours. During this period the clip is viewable in full but the cuetimes cannot be relied on.
  
  If our assistance with this issue was useful to you, please consider sharing your success story so that others might benefit.
  
• 
  Edwin Jonk: You can ask Googlebot to crawl a little slower, but normally it is not recommended:
  https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/48620?hl=en